Skip to main content

Beyond the Five-Year Plan: Alexander Friton on Scenario Thinking

Most companies have a strategy. Far fewer have a picture of the future. Alexander Friton, Managing Director of Qesar, explains that this is true of many companies in mechanical engineering, and that scenario thinking can close that gap.

In two short conversations with the Futurewise Company, Alexander explains what scenarios add to strategy work. He also shares why developments that seemed merely plausible to him two years ago now feel very real.

Strategy without a future

Alexander is candid about where they started. For a long time, nobody really asked how industry, mechanical engineering and special-purpose machinery would evolve, or what role a partnership should play in that future. “We just didn’t ask those questions.”

Planning started from the present, with a horizon of three to five years at most. Nobody looked ten or twenty years ahead. “It may sound like a contradiction,” he says, “but we work on strategy without really thinking about the future.”

Carina Stöttner sums up the gap: strategy is derived from the here and now, or from the past, instead of being shaped by several possible futures. “And that was what was missing.”

Scenarios bring structure to your thinking

For Alexander, the first benefit of scenarios is clarity. “First of all, it structures your thinking,” he says. You’re working with several options, each with its own set of conditions.

That lets him see exactly where he stands. If these conditions hold, the future could look like this. If they change, or if he starts from different assumptions, it might look completely different.

The result is a set of three, four or five scenarios he can weigh side by side. Sometimes the answer turns out to be a combination of two, but that comes later. First he thinks each scenario through on its own, and only then decides whether his future matches one of them or a mix.

Only then comes the practical question: “What does this mean for my company, for my strategy, for the company’s future?” For him, the benefit is twofold: he covers a whole range of possibilities, and he does so in a structured way.

When “plausible” becomes real

Alexander connects this to what he sees happening around him. He remembers a chart Carina showed in one of her talks at Qesar on the fragmentation of the political landscape. Twenty years ago, things were fairly stable, with three or four parties. Today there are many more, and the results of the once-large and once-small parties are much closer together. That means more frequent changes of government, which is exactly what he’s seeing now. Her point back then, that companies could no longer count on a steady political course and should take matters into their own hands, has increasingly become reality.

He sees business owners doing exactly that and turning their focus inward. They concentrate on what they can control and shrug off the rest: “It’s out of our hands anyway.” The external conditions are still there, he says, but they matter less, “or at least they’ve lost some of their power to frustrate us.”

That’s exactly why scenarios matter so much to him. Because external conditions are harder to predict than they used to be, companies need to ask what that means for the future and which scenarios might follow.

When Carina raised this two years ago, it felt to him “plausible, but not quite real yet.” Today he says: “Okay, this is real now. We’re already there.”

Look further ahead, check in more often

A longer horizon doesn’t mean waiting decades to find out whether you were right. Even with a long-term perspective, Alexander says, you can check after two years whether you’re on track or need to adjust course a little.

His advice to other leaders is clear: “Look further into the future, and review more often to see whether it still fits.”

And what if things turn out completely differently? For him, that’s part of it too: you have to learn to break out of familiar templates and patterns.

For leaders rethinking their own approach, his experience offers three lessons:

  • Build strategy from several possible futures, not just forward from the present.
  • Develop several scenarios first, and only combine them once each one has been fully thought through.
  • Pair a long horizon with regular reviews, and be willing to break out of familiar patterns.

Watch the full video here:

Foresight: Meaning, Methods and Benefits Explained Simply

Foresight shows up everywhere these days: in job ads, strategy papers and innovation departments. But what does the term actually mean? This article explains what foresight is, how it differs from forecasting and trend research, and which methods organisations use to work with the future in a structured way.

Key takeaways

  • Foresight literally means looking ahead or anticipation.
  • As a technical term, it refers to the systematic exploration of multiple possible futures.
  • The goal is not the correct prediction, but the better decision today.
  • Core methods: horizon scanning, STEEP analysis, scenario planning, Delphi, backcasting, roadmapping.

What does foresight mean?

Foresight means the ability to see ahead, anticipate or look into the future. Its counterpart is hindsight, the view back on events after the fact.

In a professional context, the term does not describe a personal talent but a structured way of working:

Short definition: Foresight is the systematic exploration of possible futures in order to make better decisions today.

Two things in this definition matter. First, the plural: foresight does not ask about the future but about several conceivable developments. Second, the link to the present. The aim is not to predict the future correctly but to increase one’s own capacity to act.

Origin and spread of the term

The word is made up of fore (ahead) and sight and has been in use in English since the Middle Ages. As a technical term it gained currency from the 1970s onwards, when Japan began running regular national Delphi studies on technological developments. In the 1990s, government foresight programmes followed in the United Kingdom, Germany and at EU level. Since then, the approach has spread from technology policy into companies, NGOs and public administration.

Two levels of meaning

Depending on the context, foresight means different things:

  • In everyday language, foresight describes a quality in people. Someone with foresight thinks ahead, recognises consequences early and takes precautions accordingly.
  • As a discipline, foresight refers to a field with its own methods, roles and processes. It is part of futures studies and is specified further according to its area of application: strategic foresight, corporate foresight, technology foresight or policy foresight.

Foresight, forecasting and trend research compared

The terms are often used interchangeably, but they mean different things.

ApproachGuiding questionTime horizonOutput
ForecastingWhat is most likely to happen?short to medium terma number, a value, a range
Trend researchWhich developments are already visible?ongoingdescribed trends and patterns
ForesightWhat could happen, and what would it mean for us?medium to long termseveral images of the future plus options for action
VisionWhich future do we want to reach?long terma desired target state
Foresight compared with forecasting, trend research and vision.

A sales forecast for the coming quarter is forecasting. Asking what your business model would need to look like in ten years under four very different sets of conditions is foresight.

Strategic foresight and corporate foresight

Strategic foresight links futures work directly to strategy development. The insights feed into portfolio decisions, investments and risk management rather than ending up in a report.

Corporate foresight refers to embedding this work permanently in the company, for example through a dedicated team, a trend radar or regular formats at leadership level.

Studies on the future readiness of companies show a recurring pattern: organisations that pick up changes in their environment early and process them in a way that connects internally respond faster to market disruptions than competitors without such structures.

Why foresight is becoming more important

Several developments are increasing the need for forward-looking work:

  • Shorter innovation cycles, particularly driven by artificial intelligence and automation
  • Regulatory dynamics, for example around sustainability, supply chains and data protection
  • Geopolitical uncertainty with direct consequences for sourcing and sales markets
  • Demographic change and shifting expectations of work
  • Climate change with both physical and transition risks

In environments like these, extrapolating the past loses its explanatory power. That is exactly where foresight comes in.

The most important foresight methods

Horizon scanning

Systematic monitoring of signals from science, politics, technology and society. The aim is to pick up weak signals before they become trends.

STEEP analysis

Structuring the environment along the dimensions of Society, Technology, Economy, Ecology and Politics. It prevents the analysis from narrowing down to one’s own industry.

Scenario planning

The best-known foresight method. From the key uncertainties, usually three to four internally consistent images of the future are developed and then tested against the organisation’s own strategy.

Delphi survey

A multi-round, anonymous expert survey. After each round, participants receive the aggregated results and can reconsider their assessment.

Wild cards and black swans

Events with a low probability of occurring but a high impact. They are deliberately played through to expose blind spots.

Backcasting

The path runs backwards from the target state to the present. The question is: what would need to have happened, and by when, for this state to come about?

Roadmapping

Translates images of the future into concrete milestones for technology, product and capability building.

How a foresight process works

  1. Set the frame. Define the decision question, time horizon and scope.
  2. Scan. Collect signals, data and expert knowledge.
  3. Analyse. Identify and assess drivers and uncertainties.
  4. Design futures. Develop scenarios or images of the future.
  5. Derive. Define strategic options, early indicators and next steps.

The fifth step determines the value. Without a link to real decisions, foresight remains a workshop experience.

Common mistakes

  • Mistaking foresight for prediction and ending up pursuing only one scenario
  • Choosing a time horizon so short that the analysis shrinks down to existing plans
  • Relying exclusively on internal perspectives
  • Documenting results without assigning responsibilities and defining early indicators
  • Running the process once instead of updating it regularly

Frequently asked questions about the meaning of foresight

What does foresight mean?

Foresight means looking ahead or anticipating what is to come. As a technical term, it stands for the systematic exploration of possible futures.

What is the difference between foresight and forecasting?

Forecasting calculates the most likely development of a given variable. Foresight works with several possible futures and asks what they mean for one’s own actions.

Is foresight the same as futures studies?

Futures studies is the umbrella term for the academic study of the future. Foresight refers to the application-oriented practice within that field.

What does a foresight manager do?

They monitor the business environment, facilitate scenario and strategy processes, maintain trend radars and translate insights into recommendations for senior management.

Which organisations benefit from foresight?

Any organisation with long investment cycles, dense regulation or rapid technological change. Smaller organisations can start with a lean trend radar and an annual scenario workshop.

Conclusion

The meaning of foresight can be reduced to a simple formula: not predicting the future, but being prepared for several futures. Those who capture environmental signals in a structured way, translate them into scenarios and derive verifiable options for action from them buy themselves reaction time. That is precisely the practical value of this discipline.

Ideas from our foresight work with executives that every leader should know

When we think about the future, our attention goes forward almost automatically: to trends, scenarios, risks and opportunities. But one of the most underrated questions in strategic leadership isn’t what comes next?

It’s this:

What would we have decided differently in the past?

I have little time for simply extending past developments in a straight line into the future. But questioning past decisions — even playing out alternative pasts in your head — is a remarkably effective instrument for making better decisions tomorrow.

Two methods I use regularly in my work with leadership teams:

1. Counterfactual thinking: what if we had decided differently?

Picture a city that handed its best city-center locations to large shopping centers and international chains in the 2010s: H&M, Zara, the usual names.

At the time it looked sensible. Big brands were considered safe. They brought footfall, spending power and reliable tax revenue.

Ten years on, the city center is hollowed out. E-commerce has eaten away at a lot of those store models. Rents stayed high. The cafés, independent shops and local concepts that make a city center feel alive never had a real chance.

The underlying assumption back then was:
large chains are resilient. They draw people in. They’re the future.

But what if the city had decided differently? What could it have done instead, and what would the consequences have been?

That’s where counterfactual thinking earns its keep. The method doesn’t only show what went wrong. It exposes which assumption made the decision feel obvious at the time.

And that’s what makes it strategically relevant today:

Which of our current certainties will look like that empty shopping center in ten years?

2. The pre-mortem: how did it fail?

The second approach is the pre-mortem.

A city is planning its first big marathon. Before any decisions are final, the team asks an unusual question:

Imagine it’s the evening after the event — and it was a failure. What happened?

Suddenly the answers start arriving:

  • Not enough medical staff along the route
  • Road closures were never communicated to residents
  • Aid stations were in the wrong places
  • The start clashed with another major event

None of it was in the original plan. All of it could be fixed in time.

The pre-mortem shifts the perspective. Instead of asking abstractly could this fail?, it asks something more concrete and more useful:

How did it fail?

Imagining failure in advance makes it far more likely you’ll spot the real risks early — before they get expensive.

Why these methods matter for leaders

Strategic work involves a lot of looking forward: market shifts, technological developments, geopolitical scenarios.

But some of the clearest thinking about the future comes from an honest — or hypothetical — look backwards.

Because that’s where you see:

  • which assumptions you’d been treating as facts
  • which risks you systematically underestimated
  • which thinking errors you may well be repeating right now

Being ready for the future isn’t only about looking ahead. It’s also about examining your own certainties.